koganf: (Default)
Felix Kogan ([personal profile] koganf) wrote2020-10-04 02:36 pm
  • Add Memory
  • Share This Entry

The Party of The Big Lie

Racial provokers

  1. A useful reminder, Trump despised nazis all his life. When a "kerfuffle" happened in 2016 because Trump said he doesn't remember who David duke was, the same Left angrily insisted he must remember - because he mentioned and condemned him earlier. It is absolutely not strange that Trump is not a racist, if you remember that Trump grew up in New York, made useful connections in the local clubs and buddied with very diverse people, - of all races, religions and sexual orientations. And he was a highly visible figure. And he regularly crossed paths with the racial stooges like Sharpton. Should he be a racist, an antisemite or a homophobe, or something else along these lines - New York times would have found people that confirmed that for us already back in 2016. Make no mistake, they searched!

  2. The press, clearly, found different witnesses, and the different confirmations in the archives that showed that the racism accusations are untrue, but they decided that the people don't need that information. This, I believe, no news channels will show us and, I think, social networks would delete this where they can:



  3. Joe Biden haven't condemned Nazis all his life. He buddied with the segregationists. We know that because he boasted about that. Biden praised George Wallace, that tried to block the schools for the black kids with his own body, - as Biden explained, because Wallace "is not afraid to protect what we all in our soul think is right". Biden considered Senator Stennis "a man of character and courage", the fact that Senator signed The Southern Manifesto notwithstanding. Many were against "busing" on the Left and on the Right, but Biden was against for a very interesting reason - he thought that the segregation was good for Blacks. Biden suggested to not rush with the integration to avoid creating "the racial jungle".

  4. Of course, nobody pestered Biden demanding that he publicly recanted his former praises, but all Democrats in politics and in media demanded that Trump condemned the "white supremacists" and distanced himself from them in despite that Trump never praised them, never befriended them, never boasted their praise like Biden, and the alleged reason was that someone from supremacists supported Trump.

  5. And, of course, Trump condemned and distanced. But, in despite of that, racial stooges continued to demand that he did that, repeating the lie that it hasn't happened, and Trump owes that.


Party of propaganda, lies and slander

  1. It went downhill from there. What would you do it the person you accused of antisemitism turned out the most pro-Israel president from the time of Israel foundation? What would you do if it turned out that the person you accused of racism takes a bunch of measures boosting the growth of the industry and the small businesses and, as a result, unemployment among the minorities drops and salary increases, and he constantly boasts about it? You would probably get confused, and, maybe, would apologize.

  2. But you, I guess, are not a Democrat or, at least, not one of those that think that Tulsi Gabbard must be expelled from the party ASAP. Majority of the Democrats, including all the Party's head, Party-affiliated media and small propa-condoms in LJ, - haven't spared the efforts to support that tale about the Trump's racism.

  3. Even worse, from pulling racism in "kicking and screaming". from the search of the "dog whistles" they switched to the direct, dull lies. When Trump said that some Congresswomen, which immigrated in US and now say that our country sucks, should go back to their country, fix the government on their historical motherland, and then we'll discuss what they achieved. In that form it was not very well suited for the propaganda purposes, so Media, without much deliberations, announced that they know, what Trump meant and just inserted racism into the text, like Trump said that black and colored women are not Americans bit immigrants and said them to "go back to their Israel"!

  4. The most blatant example - from the Trump's text about the Charlottesville event thye just threw out all where Trump very directly condemns the supremacists, threw out all the text where he emphasized that the phrase about the "good people" is not related to supremacists, and lied that he hasn't condemned and he called the supremacists "good people". No inventiveness, no "we know what he meant", no, just cut out the piece and announced that it wasn't there.

  5. And they continue that lie. They know it is a lie. They know we know it is a lie. We all discussed that it was a lie. But they continue telling that lie - because they know that there are voters that, like Professor [livejournal.com profile] ksonin think that New York Times is a honest newspaper (or CNN, or MSNBC, or the rest of them), and consume information about the world only from there. They even explained that in such a difficult time, when Trump is President, journalists just cannot remain impartial!

  6. This is not just propaganda wing of the Party. This lie is an official platform of the Party, as the candidate from the Party for the post of President continues telling that lie - publicly and officially. And nobody at all objects from the Left. Nobody says, like, I'm sorry, but I can't allow that on my behalf... Nobody even tries to say thins personally, like, Joe, don't do that, we think it is shameful , - and I know that because Biden continues repeating this lie. An, as we all have seen, not the "journalist" Stephanopoulos during the interview, not the "journalist" during the debates don't try to object to Biden, like, what is it, it is not true, I personally heard Trump saying that, I personally asked him, publicly, and, actually, Trump has been saying that for a long time, how can you lie like that?!


Racial stooge Wallace

  1. "Moderator" of the debates, Wallace hasn't just not asked Biden about his lie, he joined in.

  2. Wallace announced that it is necessary to ask one of the candidates to condemn his supporters that destroy, burn and loot the cities, - and, of course, he didn't have in mind Antifa and Biden. To the contrary, he dismissed that question. Like, Trump calls for Biden all the time to condemn Antifa, but on these debates we won't ask Biden, why he refuses, we better ask Trump why wouldn't he condemn the white supremacists that inflame the situation?

  3. Our media won't remind you that, but, to really appreciate the honest eyes of Wallace, when he pretends that it is an important question that Trump has still not answered, here's a scene from the 2016 debates, when the same Wallace asked the same question, already a lie.



  4. In the last debates the Wallace's question was propped by a double lie, - first, the burners and the looters are Antifa, not supremacists. White supremacists can only envy Antifa. White supremacists would love to burn and loot the black neighborhoods, under the protection of Democratic Party, Party Media and Party people in the Prosecutor's office who immediately release all arrested by the police and with the bailout fund where the Party leaders help to collect money, including Kamala, - like Antifa does it. For the "alternatively smart" friends from the Left, - nobody insists that there are no supremacists at all. But, Kamala wouldn't collet money for the bailouts if she thought these are supremacists and Soros' prosecutors wouldn't let them go immediately. When the Left say that "supremacists" inflame something, they mean that any person that tries to stand against Antifa they immediately declare a white supremacists - by the fact of standing up to Antifa and the fact itself they describe as "inflaming".

  5. Second lie was that Trump hasn't condemned the supremacists so far and, here, Wallace offers him to fill that gap.

  6. But two lies were not enough. The question was in the best tradition of "have you stopped drinking cognac in the mornings", when it is demanded that one question covered two different statements, - "are you ready to condemn white supremacists and militias and say that they need to stop and not add to the pogroms in Kenosha and Portland?" - The scoundrel Wallace formulated the question in such a way that the affirmative answer would mean that significant danger comes not from Antifa but from supremacists and the negative would allow to scream that he "refused to condemn supremacists".

  7. It is very clear from the video that, when Wallace reached "condemn white supremacists", Trump calmly said, - "of course". When Wallace finished, Trump said , - "I'm ready to do that, but practically all I see comes from the Left not from the Right", - absolutely correct answer. Demagogical question splits in two parts and Trump announces that he is ready to condemn supremacists but (and he just confirmed that he condemns), but the statement that they somehow are the significant part of the pogroms - is a lie and the attempt to take away the guilt from Antifa and those who cover it up.

  8. Such an answer, of course, was not convenient neither for Biden not for Wallace. They pretended that neither first "sure" nor the second "I'm ready to do so" count, they need a "yes" or "no" answer and, over the Trump's explanation, interrupting him, started droning, - "then say it, say it"!

  9. Wallace insisted that Trump asked "them to stop". Trump asked, who? Wallace said, Proud Boys. Трамп said, - Proud Boys, stop (stand down and stand by).

  10. After that Trump said that something needs to be done with Antifa, - and there Biden, referring to the FBI Director, lied that Antifa is not an organization, it is an idea. Andy Ngo, that Antifa presented with a concussion, has different information.


Party of propaganda, lies and libels, continued

  1. The flood of lies continued lafter the debates. Biden started lying immediately that Trump hasn't condemned the supremacists.

  2. Here Biden made a small mistake. Since the Left label everyone who interferes with Antifa white supremacists, they, without thinking twice, labeled as such Kyle Rittenhouse that went to Kenosha to provide medical help and help with firefighting. And, of course, Biden campaign's people included the picture of Kyle Rittenhouse into their compilation that supposed to depict the onslaught of supremacists. Kyle, though, was easily recognizable, and, so, Biden put himself under the accusation inlibel.

  3. Kyle's lawyers proclaimed that either Biden publicly admits it is a libel, or they will file a lawsuit. Biden got himself in a pickle. Admitting of the lie damages the campaign. Refusal would mean he supports the libel. That would not be possible to write off as a campaign workers mistake - it is now his personal, thought through statement.

  4. By the way, recent news in the NBC that the DHS personnel were ordered to speak in favor of Rittenhouse - is a provale lie.

  5. I haven't looked much into "Proud boys" that Wallace, byt the PArty's instruction, labeled white supremacists, but it looks like a massive lie as well. Current chairman of the organization - black Cuban Enrique Tarrio, the leader of the group "Latino for Trump" in parallel. Here the founder of the groups explains what the group does support and that they are tired and are going to sue everyone who calls them nacists and supremacists. They could be accused in misogynism since they say they are man'c club and for the patriarchy, but there is no racism in his text, - he speaks against racism very directly.



  6. Party, of course, rushed to support the lie that Antifa is not an organization at all, and, of course, everything that is going on is not Antifa and BLM, and, quite teh opposite, the white supremacists and Trump refused to condemn them.



  7. Americans, don't trust your lying eyes! People who were standing in front of the burning buildings and tellig you that there were, mostly, peaceful protests, now will tell you that all the pogroms are the doing of the supremacists. And Antifa - is just an idea, no organization at all, nothing to see here...



  8. Quite amazingly, Нью Йорк Таймс let through a counter-revolutionary article (I suspect they signed it into print before the debates, not knowing that it undermines a very important Party slogan), that says that one journalist-photographer noticed something that has been discussed in the conservative blogs for a while, - he noticed that during the looting there is a group in black that don't loot themselves but direct and guide the process. Then he noticed the same in the other cases, and noticed that the pogroms start with arrival of such "brigade" that breaks the windows, initiating the looting. He decided to dress in black insert himself into the group of stooges, expecting to uncover the group of white supremacists. Four months he was doing that in multiple cities, but couldn't find supremacists. Found that these are "insurrection-minded anarchists".

  9. Elizabeth Warren, like many other, started accusing Trump that he not only not condemned them but also said them to "stand by". Trump did what Wallace asked him. Wallace asked - can you tell them "to stand by", and Trump said - "stand by". They both meant "to stop", but Warren and other scoundrels tried to change the meaning to "be ready".

  10. The CNN "journalist", Acosta, that back in 2017 knew, that Trump condemend supremacists in Charlottesville, now removed that non-useful memory from his brain, and announced indignantly, that Trump jsut now condemned supremacists!

  11. The FOX "journalist", John Roberts asked Trump's press-secretary, can she unequivocally explain if Trump does condemn white supremcaism? She responded that they already answered that question, before and during the debates President three times said that, yes, of course и yesterday he was asked and he clearly said that yes, condemns, and she reads a few quotes from Trump where he very clearly condemns, and she concludes that Trump condemned white supremacism more than any other President in the history of USA. -- And "journalist" Roberts waves it way (literally, with his hand) and says, for the clarity, can you make a statement that he condemns? -- she says, "I just did", -- and he responds - well, these were past, quotes, why can't you do it today?…



  12. This is something clinical, I think, when journalist rejects the statement that Trump condemned supremacism because it happened in the past. And, mind you, the quotes are not from Trump's youth many years ago, this is for the last few years and the last quote is from yesterday. And, if you still doubt that they are brain-fucked propa-condoms, here is a cherry on the cake - that last quote where Trump condemned supremacisms, it was an answer for the question that Trump was asked by asked Kyra Phillips, idiot Roberts' spouse.




  13. Waht do you think did Roberts do when people stuck this in his face? Apologized? Quit, when the boss told him that journalist's carrier is based solely on how trustworthy he is? Got embarrassed and hid himself from public? No, he got a publictantrum, like, how dare you criticize me and deflect my questions!

  14. Not a single journalist asked Biden to condemn white supremacists. Rishard Spencer endorsed Biden, but nobodyask biden to distance himself from Spencer.

  15. Not a single journalist asked Biden to condemn Antifa and explain his lie that it is "not an organization".

  16. summing up this part, join again the opinion of Scott Adams (#36), - among everything that Democrats, Biden, Party Mass Media, helpers of that media in the blogs, - there is nothing more abhorrent and dangerous than constant lies directed to flaming up the racial war.

  17. Biden's tales that he is looking for a national reconciliation, unity of the country, return to normalcy - damn lies. That bastard has always been flaming up racial war. When he said that integration means "racial jungle". When he claimed that Mitt Romney will "put the blacks back in chains". And now he is back to the same. His brains are not what they used to be but he remains the scoundrel he always was.

  18. The Democrats flame up the racial war quite deliberately. Using any means - lies, libels, propaganda, direct terrorism, on a huge scale, without any scruples.

Debates

  1. Just before teh debates turned out, that absolutely non-partisan Twitter gave the Biden's campaign the account @Truth. (Nothing new, just again the Pravda newsletter. It is interesting, what year had the Commies got a fresh idea last time? I think their last invention was to claim themselves antifascists. Anything after that?)

  2. The Trump's campaign stated that a few days ago the Biden's campaign accepted a small check - if there are any devices in the ears of candidates, but today they announced that they refuse. And also they asked to make 2 breaks in teh bates - every 30 minutes. Biden's campaign denies both and say that the idea of checking the ears is stupid and Biden doesn't use anything and won't allow to check himself.

  3. I watched the debates in pieces, it makes me angry every time - Biden could have been destroyed on each question. "Election will decide who appoints the Justice", - Trump had to say that election has decided that already, Trump and Republican Senators have their duties and must fulfill them up until the moment the People votes for someone else. I would also remind Biden about the Logan's Act, - haven't you suggested to investigate my adviser for the communications with foreign states AFTER the election? And werent it you and Obama that tried to get the anti-Israely resolution in the UN AFTER the election, knowing that the People choose me and my politics? How dare you to insist that we don't do something we were elected for BEFORE the election?

  4. Biden held well all the time, didn't get lost, didn't fall on the floor, exceeded the expectations.

  5. Biden lied that he doesn't support Green New Deal right after the proudly announced that hte program will pay for itself. His campaign's website informs that he supports GND. Kamal Harris was a con-sponsor of the GND law.

  6. Biden lied that the conclusion of two Senate commissions that his son got $3.5M from Baturina was "discredited just about by everyone" and refused to discuss that topic.

  7. Biden lied that the economy was booming under Obama - although the earnings were not growing and GDP was growing a couple percent a year and they tied to convince us that this is "new normal". And Trump caused a recession! (I don't think why Trump answered very weakly, - he could say that the exit from teh recession under him will be in months, not years, and the marked has rebounded already, and the jobs are coming back.)

  8. Biden refused to answer the question if he is going to "pack the Supreme Court" so he can stuff "liberals" there. Kamal reject as well.

  9. This is something that I repeated many times - Biden's and Kamala's lies are completely incomparable with the Trump's lies. Biden and Kamal lie about what they are, what they believe in, what they are going to do. Barring the constant racial lies, from all lies for a politician - it is the worst.

  10. BTW, when Biden was asked about that, Trump insisted on the answer, - like, answer on this! On the surface, looks like Biden demanded the answer for the supremacists condemnation, but there are three big differences - first, teh question to Biden was legitimate - there was no embedded double-meaning and a lie, any direct answer would be interpreted unequivocally. Second, Trump answered the question that has been asked, both parts and Biden avoided the answer. Third, Biden said to the Trump - shut up!!! -- you make no mistake, our Left reacted the same way as the Russian "patriots" react when the Russian ambassador gives rude answers at the UN session, - cheerfully. Like, how cool was that! Moral victory, like - shut up!!!

  11. What else? The moderator Wallace lied that the "Critical Race Theory", teaching of what Trump prohibited - it is just "classes of racial sensitivity" . It is like calling Marxism course the lectures about good relations with the workers.

  12. And, of course, all the fact-checkers lied as well - thanks to Drew Holden, I don't have to compile this myself, he already did it.

  13. Trump said Biden had accused him in xenophobia for the China travel restrictions and CNN lied that it is not known whether or not Biden knew about the restrictions when he did that, - although Biden accused him in the tweet that directly responded to the Trump's tweet about the restrictions.

  14. Washington Post lied that Biden doesn't support the Green New Deal.

  15. Washington Post lied that the Trump's statement that the forest fires happen because of wrong forest management, when all small fires get extinguished immediately, collecting the flammable material, is incorrect. Although that precisely has been discussed for many decades.

  16. CNN lied that there are absolutely no evidence that Obama or Biden have been personally involved in the Trump campaign surveillance.

  17. CNN lied that Trump lied that Biden hasn't condemned the pogroms, where as in reality Biden only didn't condemn the peaceful protests, but the non-peaceful he, like, condemned. Biden condemned the pogroms only recently, months after they started happening, and only after the polls showed that the people don't like the pogroms.

  18. New York Times proclaimed that Trump incorrectly said that the economy rebound was the slowest in history under Obama - with a wonderful explanation that, even though the speed of GDP growth was the slowest, but, generally, the speed was slowing down for a while, and the people got older, and so on...

  19. New York Times lied that Trump incorrectly accuses Antifa in that the main disorder is product of their actions.

  20. Media doesn't recall how Biden behaved 8 years ago during the debates with Paul Ryan. It is only Trump who is rude, and nobody else.

  21. And, to boot, nobody is fact-checking the boasting of Biden how well he and Obama managed with H1N1, - although they haven't managed it at all, there were about 60M infected and we were just lucky that virus was not as deadly - еif it was like COVIDд, then 1.8M would die from H1N1, not just 12 thousands. Meanwhile, 1282 children died from H1N1, - 13 times more than now.

Party of election scammers

  1. Another group of democrat scammers that practiced the "ballot harvesting" in Texas, totally 134 accusations against a county "commissar" and three accomplices.

  2. In the same Texas the Harris county got sued because they register people that hadn't just had proved that they were citizens, but hadn't even claimed that they were citizens - either hadn't marked the answer to the question if they are citizens or even answered "no". This is, of course, pure coincidence, single occasion, - if you don't consider that just recently in the same county the groups of Democrats, including the county's "commissar", got busted for the attempt for mass scamming with the bulletin collection. (#6).

  3. Project Veritas released the second video how they buys bulletins for the voting in Minnesota.

  4. Tulsi Gabbard stated that all this demonstrates teh necessity to ban the "ballot harvesting". I agree but think it is not enough. She stated that it is not a partisan question. I agree again but I'd add, - with the assumption that one of the parties doesn't count on scamming as the significant part of its strategy.

  5. People in New York started getting the bulletins that, likely, randomly stuffed into the envelopes. IT can be written off to the idiocy of the government and its contractors, but it is impossvilbe to write off to the idiocy the constant demands of Democrats that we vote specifically this way.

  6. In four states teh courts changed the voting laws, sentencing that need to be counted: the bulletins arriving by mail after a whole week since the election. bulletins without a postal stamp, with a signature that doesn't correspond with the signature on the registration, - in a word, so that scamming was maximally easy. But, since the Constitution says that the method of voting is decided by the states' legislators but not the courts, these decisions the Supreme Cour will strike down practically certainly and the same Democrats will be terribly indignant that they promised the voters 7 extra days, but there is none, so, the voters are fucked, evidently - by Republicans!

P.S. Trump's taxes

  1. Funny video from Viva Frei, where he explains that one of the laws that Nancy uses to reproach Trump, like he "abused the tax laws!" - was "Great Recession Bailout" voted in by the Democratic Senate and Democratic Congress under the chairmanship of Democrat Nancy Pelosi.