Biden and party - the twin brothers

Oct. 15th, 2020 07:40 pm
koganf: (Default)
[personal profile] koganf

Racial stooges

  1. An attempts to kidnap the Michigan Governor has been uncovered. One of the perpetrators, Brandon Caserta, anarchist, against police and Trump. The second, Pete Musico, explains that the main enemy - government and police. The third, Daniel Harris, participated in the BLM protests.

  2. In despite of that, the Governor immediately started to lie that it is all fault of Trump and the "Proud Boys".

  3. The racial stooge Biden of course, suggested the same. Additionally he lied again that Trump refused to tell supremacists to stop and repeated the lie that Trump "called both sides good people".

  4. Not one from the reporters asked Biden or the Governor, like, this is a lie, right? Hot one of the Party leaders asked to stop the lies. Apparently, Biden was right when saying that "I am the Democratic party". Discussing the racial stooges we say "Biden" - but assume Democratic party.

  5. Biden continues to lie about what Trump said about the Proud boys and that the Proud boys are white supremacists.

  6. Here is, BTW an interview with the leader of the Proud Boys, Enrique Tarrio, Cuban-African by descent, - pay attention, the reporter asks the questions that they would never ever ask Antifa - "I don't understand why did youorganize the protest, to antagonize the people?" Or "What is your message, many think that you're xenophobes, non-tolerant racists…" (In his place I would ask in return, like, you're a journalis, you can immediately look up our site and check what do we say, what are our ideas and make sure that only lying racial stooge can accuse us in racism. Did you do it? )

  7. If the Proud Boys decided already to sue Biden and the rest for the defamation, I would add Wikipedia in the list - they impudently labeled their group "neo-nazy".

  8. Biden's supporter gets to listen the record where Biden says, - "if you don't vote for me, you ain't black".


Party of propaganda

  1. Not just propaganda but in the worst Commy sense - with the choral declamations of the Party slogans, when all the Media and all the politicians repeat the same word or a phrase in a chorus, pronounce the same argument with the same words. Plus the practically sealed protective wall around the candidate which the Media plays along to and doesn't ask the inconvenient questions - and it is visible particularly well when a small hole appears in that wall and someone accidentally asks a fair question, and immediately there as a commotion and confusion and discussion and it becomes an event - like, look, look - how do you like it! The same way as a fair question to Trump would be an event among "Say, why don you refuse to condemn the supremacists?"

  2. -- You said that won't say before the electionе if you are going to "pack the Court", but the voters are asking…
    -- These are Republicans that are asking, those who don't want to discuss what they are doing to the Court.
    -- But don't they deserve to know?
    -- No, they don't!



  3. This is to the question why the satirical site BabylonBee created the additional site NotTheBee - for the news that look like satire but happened in reality. Sometimes, as you can see, they barely get to publish something in the Bee when it turns into a material for NotTheBee:



  4. Democrats already have started the standard trick with the term substitution. The traditional meaning of the term "court packing" is the attempt to work around the rules by increasing the number of justices to push in the allies. Democrats are trying to throw away the key idea of the rules workaround, - they proclaimed that, since Republicans confirmed many judges acting by the rulesо, they are also - "packing". Like, if a sports team caught on using meldonium would start screaming that they don't understand why they are singled out when their opponents also won a lot of medals! - like the problem is in the number of medals but not in the breaking the rules.

  5. For example, this slogan sounds off "journalist" Dan Rather (the man that tried to affect the 2004 election by publishing a fake a few days before the election).

  6. The Party's strategistMarshall also says, like, Republicans are "packing" themselves!

  7. The minority leader in Senate Durbin repeats the same. Pay attention to the excellent pass that the "journalis" Chuck Todd gives him - he plays the video where Biden refuses to answer the question about the "court packing" and says, like, Biden says the words "court packing", that means he is not going to do it, right?

  8. Biden, though, decided to add his own creation to the Party's text and claimed that it is anti-constitutional for the Republicans - to appoint the Justices!

  9. And then one of the exceptions happened that are so brightly visible on the background of the rules, - a CNN anchor, Tapper, suddenly committed a small act of Journalism and explained the manafer deputy from the Biden's campaign that Biden said a nonsense. -- But hte millions of people are against it! -- But that is not what the word "constitutional" means, that word doesn't mean that we like or don't like something! -- She is good at pounding away her role, you can't distract her. HE was able to explain something when she ran out of the prepared text.

Party of lies, libels, war and socialism

  1. One of the Party propagandists, Keith Olbermann, claimed that Trump must not only be defeated in the election but he himself, all hist allies and collaborators - Barr and Senator Mike Lee, and Pence, and Giuliani, and Justice Barrett, and Kyle Rittenhouse must be sued and sentenced guilty, and remove from our society, and restore the world that Trump give up to the virus! To win is not enough, Trump and these maggots must be banished. As noted Dinesh D’Souza, it is quite rare to encounter the comparison between the people and the vermin that must be exterminated after the Germany denazification.



  2. Again, none from the Left-winf politicians rushed to condemn Olbermann, distance from him, and nobody from the Party journalists asked them if they want to condemn and distance. It makes sense for us to relate to it not as to an accidental flash of the animal hatred of one marginal fascist, but as to one of those ideas about which they say first, like, that really can't happen that in the American companies or state establishments they would organize party meetings where hongweibings would force people to publicly confess in racism an demonstrate the remorse, and then that very thing would happen.

  3. Biden continues to lie that he is not going to ban fracking. Just recently he and Kamala promised to put a kibosh on everything. Biden even said that he is ready to sacrifice hundreds of thousands of workplaces to delete the oil/gas industry.



  4. You, of course, would ask why I think that Biden lies now but not earlier, at the primaries? It is easy to explain. Obama, if you remember, advertised himself as a moderate centrist and promised to comb the budget and remove all extraneous and so on. Three quarters of the voters knew that it is a lie, the rest found out after the election. Politico reminds, though, that Obama, after winning the election, pushed away the left "base" of the party and assembled the team from the Clintonian moderate nomenclature of the Party. Now the left wing of the Party recalled that "the cadres decide everything (a quote from Stalin)"© and organized presence of their people in the committees for the personnel appointing so Biden, that craves the progressivism could easily fill the government with the select progressivists. If Biden wins, the left turn will be so sharp that not only Clinton but even Obama would be remembered as the "old good days of centrism" in the Party.

  5. Biden claimed that he stood against the Castros and the Putins of the wold! -- A lie again. They considered Putin the best friend in 2012 and laughed at Romney, Obama promised to Putin flexibility with the rocket defense and fulfilled the promise, then they invited Putin to Syria. Then they decided that Putin interferes with the election and all they did was that Obama said to Putin to stop it! Regarding Castro, Obama-Biden administration shook hands with him, established relations, attended joyfully baseball games together and took photos on the background of local Gestapo with the local Himmler portrait on the wall.



  6. In Portland they decided that the current major that allowed Antifa to destroy the city is not lefty enough and now there is a new leader in their election, some dame that says - I'm Antifa and poses in a skirt with the portraits of Mao, Stalin, Che and other respected leaders. Her campaign's manager honestly says that he is a communist.

  7. BTW, have you noticed that these pogroms started disappearing from the news? I hope nobody thinks they ended? They continue. But, since Biden said that Antifa is "just an idea", they don't exist anymore.

  8. Exactly like this, our Media is absolutely not interesed in Tara Reid that accuses Biden in a rape. Nobody cares that her accusation is much more strong than against Kavanaugh and many of the Left, including Kamala, said they Tara Reid. They believe that Biden grabbed Tara's pussy but it is OK for them.



  9. Putin said that he is ready to work with any President and emphasized as a former Communist with 20 years tenure that Democratic party is traditionally closer to the ideas that were the base for the Communist party ideology. Newsweek mightily suggest that it is the same that Trump says - that Democrats are socialists and that means Putin supports Trump. But here I'm a bit confused since it sounds like Newsweek thinks that being close to Communists and socialists is bad? If so, they must quickly tell this to their Party comrades in Portland!

  10. Nobody thinks, of course, that the ideological closeness is so important for Putin. Nobody thinks that Putin can't sleep at night, worrying about the American Proletariat suffering without socialism, like, let Biden win ASAP and provided all with the free medicine, pensions and all the rest that was so abundant in the wonderful SSSR. What really is interesting for Putin is the shrinkage of the oil and gas industry in the USA, which would allow him to raise the oil and gas prices, so important for the military and, particularly, personal budget. Reliable barrier for the creation of new gas pipelines, as a result of which the USA will be dependent on the delivery of the Russian gas. Not hard to guess who he really bets on.

  11. And, of course, Putin also prefers such politicians that invite him to Syria so they can get away from the political responsibility for the blabbering about the "red line", - but not such that stop the Russian mercenaries to seize the oil fields.

  12. People discuss the old lie that Trump miked a disabled person and it became a "red pill" for Brandon Straka who founded Walkaway. Although I'm always surprised about the "red pill" tales. If he can accept the information that contradicts his picture of the world - how did he get into the state when he needed the "red pill"?



  13. NBC News discussed the election with the voters that haven't yet decided how to vote but lean towards Biden. Among those they invited some that already participated on MSNBC in the role of "a Republican that decided to vote for Biden" or "an independent
    voter that decided to vote for Biden".

Party of Intellect

  1. -- You are trying your breast, but it never feels like enough!



  2. -- 15 million dollar mini… 15 thousand dollar! Haha… 15 dollars minimum wage!



  3. Biden boasts about the police support: "I had a huge support from the police - up until the last year".

  4. After many screams of the left journalists and politicians how the horrible Trump anti-scientifically removed the mask being alone at the White House balcony, Joe Biden filmed a clip to emphasize how the truly scientific people, super-reliable leaders of Intellect must behave:



  5. The same Joe Biden:


The Honest Debates

  1. The second debates moderator, a non-paritsan journalist Steve Scully, as it appeared, used to be an intern for the Senator Biden and an assistant for the Senator Ted Kennedy. A few days ago he, likely, confused personal messages with the open Twitter and publicly discussed with Scaramucci "whether he needs to respond to Trump".



  2. co-chairman of the Debate Comission immediately announced that Scully's Twitter was hacked and it was not he who wrote that! He decided not to explain why Scaramucci wasn't only not surprised but understood immediately what it was about.

  3. C-Span, for which Scully works, confirmed that, yes, his account was hacked! They decided not to explain what does "investigate" mean. Like, have they filed a formal request to FBI, considering that, if it was a hack, that was an open attempt to influence the election?

  4. "My account has been hacked" currently became just as popular as the immortal "The dog ate my homework"©... The trailblazer was, I think Carlos Danger, - someone "hacked" his twitter to send the girls the photographs of unknown dick. Someone "hacked" the blog of the CNN journalist and added there the homophobic texts in year 2007. Of course, real hacks happen, like, say, iowahawk - but that ends up with the person painfully
    long and difficult quest to return the hacked account, but not with "oh, they hacked my account, posted my dick and disappeared!".

  5. Trump twitted that Scully isa never-Trumper, like Wallace, - and there was no limit to the indignation from the Left! It is the Real Journalis! It is the most honest person! All that doubt him are liars! Label him a never-Trumper is absurd!

  6. The Right started asking - was it long since he has been hacked? There was a tweet where he wrote "Never Trump!" - and the other where he proclaimed his love for Biden.



  7. Do you want a cherry on top? It turns out it was the third time when Scully says for the bad tweet, that, like, I've been hacked. The first time he was saying this clearly wit ha "wink", like, we are all adults here and understand that the doc hasn't eaten the homework, but then he started selling this in a serious way. Knowing his auditory - they will buy it.




  8. Want another cherry? The third debates moderator, Kristen Welker removed her Twitter account.

  9. P.S. When the VP debates were shown in China, when Pence spoke about China they had the "technical difficulties" that stopped when Kamala had the microphone. Technical difficulties is apparently their local analogue of "someone hacked my Twitter"!

Honest election

  1. Someone finds a stack of voting bulletins on a street in LA. How the local election commission is going to guarantee the honest election? Don't you worry, they have a plan! It is like this: people that find someone's bulletin must quickly call them and they come up with something!

  2. In Bakersfield, also CA, it is explained that a bulletin could easily be sent. to a non-existent person, for example, if he moved to another place. Some voters receive several bulletins for the different versions of their names. Or, for example, if a person died. Dead people won't go to the polls, but, when the State sent the bulletins to all that registered, all the dead people would receive a bulletin - because they also don't de-register themselves. This is not a problem, as described above, teh solution has been found long ago - voters wouldn't use the ability to vote several times, they will call to the commission and return the extraneous bulletins.

  3. Unfortunately, not all voters have been informed that their honesty plays important role in this schema. Here, in the same CA, some dude walks down the street and steals bulletins from the mailboxes.

  4. Some voters received bulletins where Presidential election was not included. Well, the typography made a mistake. You wouldn't expect the officials to watch over every typography where they ordered the bulletins to be printed!

  5. In South Carolina the federal court decided to cancel the State law that requires the signature of the voter on the bulletin. But the Supreme court looked it up in the Constitution and it turned out that the election schedule and details are defined but the States' legislatures but not the federal courts.

  6. In North Carolina already thousands of bulletins are in a doubtful condition, since they are not filled out properly. A lady from the local election commission explains that she has the power to decide what to do with them - but mentions that the case went to the court and they for now don't include these bulletins into the count, in case teh court disagrees that she has the power to ignore the law.

  7. Stacks of bulletins discovered in a dumpster in NJ, the postman got arrested.

  8. In Ohio 50 thousands of voters got wrong bulletins, new bulletins should be sentand they are promising that they won't let the voters to use both bulletins.

  9. In Pensilvania they found 9 bulletins thrown away, all marked for Trump. CNN are indignant that the DOJ shamelessly mentioned that they are investigating that event. Because it is not right to play so blatantly in the hands of that liar Trump that lies that vote by mail opens up possibilities for the fraud.

  10. You, of course, can say that, with the exception of the theft and postman's arrest, it is all examples not of the fraud but of the simple mistakes. It is true. Although, pay attention to the number and volume of mistakes and explain to me, what is the purpose of insisting on that method of voting!

  11. Half of a year ago it was possible to assume that there are stupid people that honestly think that the mass bulletin distribution over the mail would allow to organize the election as good as with the voting in person. Supposedly, these were such the stupid people that they were not convinced by the fact that in many states the voters' lists are not cleared from the dead and departed. Supposedly, they were so phenomenally stupid that they didn't understand the conclusions that can be made from the fact that in some counties there are more registered voters than the people with the voting right. But now, after from the primaries and now from the actual election there is a flood of information of wide-spread fuck-ups, the version of honest stupidity doesn't work anymore. If a person defends this system now, it can't be explained by stupidity. It means hopes for at least one of these, but, likely, for all three:

    1. Massive "throw-in" of extraneous and "harvested" bulletins in favor of their Party
    2. Mass confusion that will lead to the situation where the election is decided not by the voters, but by the counters
    3. Mass confusion that would allow to claim the opponent's victory non-legitimate.


  12. I would like to remind that the most prominent political technologists of the Democratic Party, John Podesta personally, already rehearsed how they reject the Trump's victory, goad "their" governors to appoint different legislators and push things to the point when Army will be involved. The fact that Democrats are preparing for that is not a hypothesis, it is an observation, it is a fact.

  13. In case that someone wants to object that Trump also suggests that he migth not accept the results of the election if he decided that there was a mass fraud, remember that Trump is agains the bulletin "carpet bombing". Trump tries to prevent teh election shit-storm, Democrats are going to use that shit-storm.

Projections

  1. Since many excitedly discuss what do the polls mean that show Biden is very much ahead of Trump, some remark. First, here is a thread, where people compare the current polls with the polls in 2016:

    • In Wisconsin Trump is 5.5% behind instead of 6.8% in 2016.
    • In Pensilvania by 7.1% instead of 8.6%.
    • In Michigan by 6.7% instead of 7.7%.
    • In Ohio by 0.6% instead of 2.4%.
    • In South Carolina by 1.4% instead of 2.4%


  2. But I would not look at the polls. It would be better to consider what could have changed significantly. In 2018 there were two factors that significantly depressed the Right enthusiasm - firstly, total spinelessness and uselessnes of the Republican Congress - and they were voting for them, not for Trump. Second, teh collusion scandal that was in full swing back then. It is more correct to compare with 2016. And, in that comparison, I don't see any changes against Trump.

  3. Первый вопрос - много ли тех, кто в 2016-м проголосовал за Трампа, а сейчас откажется - и много ли тех, кто наоборот? По-моему, ответ вполне очевиден - я видел много комментариев, в том числе от людей, которые очень влиятельны в политике, как Гленн Бек, мол, я за него не голосовал в 2016-м, но сейчас точно буду! Более того, уровень энтузиазма довольно высок - я неоднократно видел что-то типа "я был за Трампа нехотя, только потому, что он не Клинтон, но сейчас по битому стеклу поползу, чтобы за него голосовать".

  4. Обратное, конечно, тоже есть, но не так заметно, нету массовости в комментариях "я голосовал за Трампа, надеясь, что он перезаключит договоры с Мексикой и Китаем, построит стену, перенесет посольство, помирит Израиль с Арабами, заставит союзников платить за оборону, вернет рабочие места в индустрии, отменит кучи регуляций, но теперь я в нем разочаровался…"

  5. Второй вопрос, что изменилось для Демократов - опять же, я не вижу никаких изменений в лучшую сторону. Четыре года назад нам продавали Хиллари как Самого Квалифицированного Кандидата Всех Времен и Народов, Первую Женщину Президента - сейчас ничего этого нету. Байден идет на выборы как "это, хотя бы, не Трамп" (хотя, разумеется, по всем категориям ужасности Трампа - хватание за пуси, расизм, лживость, и так далее, - Байден выглядит хуже, не просто, чем Трамп, но чем самый ужасный поклеп на Трампа.)

  6. Энтузиазм слева очень так себе, Байден или его представители обычно выступают перед дюжинами избирателей:



  7. У Хиллари был талант возбуждать к себе неприязнь избирателей просто манерой поведения, которого нету у Байдена, но Демократы исправили это упущение, выбрав ему в соратники Камалу - не задумываясь, каким образом эта дама умудрилась практически всухую проиграть праймариз.

  8. Демократы могли сделать ставку на то, что с Трампом все время какое-то безумие происходит, сделать вид, что это безумие само по себе, а не Демократы его создают, и продать себя как партию возврата к нормальной тихой жизни. Вместо этого, они оказались партией Антифы, погромов и бесконечных локдаунов.

  9. Все, что работает на Демократов - это попытка обвинить Трампа в ковиде. Джейн Фонда совершенно не случайно брякнула, что это просто подарок от бога. На месте Трампа я бы сосредоточился на этом посерьезнее - и не углубляться в тонкости и детали, кто что когда говорил, но просто ткнуть пальцем в очевидное, что, если бы все это было его виной, то не было бы никакой огромной разницы между Нью Йорком, Нью Джерси, Массачусеттсом, Коннектикутом, которые выглядят как самые ужасные места в мире по смертности, - и республиканскими Штатами, которые выглядят, наоборот, очень успешно.

  10. Трампу, дополнительно, надо найти способ пробить глухую стену левой пропаганды и доложить народу экономические показатели, - в частности, что мы на пути к примерно 30%-в-год росту ВВП в третьем квартале. Тут полезно пнуть Байдена тем, что Байден хвастается самым длинным экономическим ростом, а я обещаю, что за несколько месяцев сделаю то, что они с Обамой делали восемь лет.

  11. Так что я не вижу особой причины доверять опросам. Я вижу причину сейчас звонить своим друзьям и знакомым и спрашивать у них, как их интересует перспектива, что какой-то хунвейбин потребует, чтобы они признали себя расистом на общем собрании трудового коллектива.

  • Add Memory
  • Share This Entry

Profile

koganf: (Default)
Felix Kogan

September 2025

S M T W T F S
 123 456
78910111213
1415161718 1920
21222324252627
282930    

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Feb. 18th, 2026 04:13 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios